More Than 5,000 Criminal Defense Cases and 3,000 DUI Cases Dismissed in Miami-Dade County
Skip to Content
2420 CORAL WAY MIAMI, FL 33145 786-244-8010
Top
Child Pornography

Miami Child Pornography Attorneys

Challenging Possession, Distribution, and Production of Child Pornography Charges in Florida

Have you been accused of child pornography? If so, it is critical that you retain aggressive and thorough criminal defense counsel to counter these allegations and protect your reputation, rights, and freedom.

At Beckham Law Firm, our accomplished, award-winning legal team has well over half a century of legal experience defending the rights of the accused. Our Miami child pornography defense lawyers are prepared to thoughtfully consider every viable strategy and pursue the best outcome possible in your case.

Whether your child pornography charges are on the state or federal level, our team can help. Call (786) 244-8010 or contact us online to schedule a free, confidential consultation today. 

Penalties for Child Pornography Convictions in Florida

A conviction for possession of child pornography can result in a prison sentence of up to 5 years per count, alongside hefty fines that can reach up to $5,000 per count. If the material involves a particularly young child or is considered especially egregious, the penalties may be harsher.

Distribution or transmission of child pornography is treated with even greater severity. This offense is often classified as a second-degree felony, punishable by up to 15 years in prison per count and fines up to $10,000. Again, the use of any electronic means to distribute child pornography can elevate the gravity of the charges.

Production of child pornography is among the most serious offenses, typically classified as a first-degree felony. A conviction for producing child pornography can lead to a prison sentence of up to 30 years per count, and fines may soar up to $15,000. Furthermore, offenders may face mandatory minimum sentences, particularly if the crime involves a minor below a certain age.

Additionally, beyond incarceration and financial penalties, convicted individuals are required to register as sex offenders. Sex offender registration comes with numerous restrictions that can significantly impact an individual’s personal and professional life.

Some of these consequences can include:

  • Residency restrictions. Registered sex offenders are prohibited from living within a certain distance of schools, parks, playgrounds, and other places where children congregate. These limitations can make finding suitable housing challenging and can force individuals to live in specific, often less desirable areas.
  • Employment limitations. Many employers are reluctant to hire individuals listed on the sex offender registry, which can severely limit job opportunities. Additionally, certain professions, especially those involving contact with children or vulnerable populations, are typically off-limits.
  • Ongoing public disclosure. The status of a registered sex offender is publicly accessible, which can impact both personal and professional relationships. Neighbors, colleagues, and community members can easily access this information.
  • Travel restrictions. Traveling can be complicated for registered sex offenders. Before traveling out of state, Florida sex offenders are required to report in person to the local sheriff's office and provide full details of their intended destination.
  • Regular check-ins with law enforcement. Registered sex offenders must comply with periodic check-ins and updates with local law enforcement. This includes updating any changes in residence, employment, or other significant life changes, which can be an ongoing burden.
  • Social stigma and isolation. The societal stigma attached to being a registered sex offender can lead to social isolation, mental health issues, and significant emotional distress. Building or maintaining personal relationships can become exceedingly difficult.

Your defense can’t wait. Speak to our Miami child pornography attorneys today by calling (786) 244-8010 or contacting us online.

Continue Reading Read Less

What Is Considered Child Pornography?

Florida Statute 827.071(5) defines the offense of knowingly possessing, controlling, or viewing any media that depicts sexual conduct by a child. This is considered a third-degree felony. 

Note that each item of child pornography found (each magazine, photo, and so on) counts as its own separate sex crime offense. While possession alone is very serious, participation in the production or distribution of child pornography is considered an even more severe offense.

Production and distribution of child pornography include:

  • Employing or permitting a minor for a sexual performance – 827.071(2)
  • Promoting the sexual performance of a child – 827.071(3)
  • Possessing media depicting the sexual performance of a child with intent to promote – 827.071(4)

In our digital age, it is now common for the “transmission” or sending of child pornography to happen over the Internet. This can constitute a federal offense, which is subject to its own set of statutes and penalties. For more information on your charges, what penalties you could be facing, and how our firm can help mount an effective and assertive defense in your favor, reach out to our Miami child pornography attorneys.

    Admissibility of Evidence in Child Pornography Cases

    Below are some of the factors our Miami child pornography lawyers at Beckham Law Firm can assess when evaluating the potential admissibility of evidence in your case.

    The admissibility of evidence in child pornography cases can significantly impact the outcome of a trial. Courts in Florida follow strict legal standards to determine which evidence can be presented before a jury. This process is governed by both statutory laws and case law precedents.

  • Search and Seizure
    The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. In child pornography cases, the prosecution often relies on evidence obtained from electronic devices such as computers, smartphones, and tablets. For such evidence to be admissible, law enforcement must typically obtain a valid search warrant based on probable cause. The warrant must be specific, detailing the place to be searched and the items to be seized. Any evidence obtained through an unlawful search and seizure may be subject to suppression under the exclusionary rule, which means it cannot be used in court.
  • Complications of Digital Evidence
    Digital evidence frequently plays a central role in child pornography cases, and its admissibility is subject to rigorous scrutiny. Law enforcement agencies must ensure that the collection, preservation, and analysis of digital evidence comply with established forensic standards. For example, a proper chain of custody must be maintained to demonstrate that the evidence has not been tampered with or altered. Additionally, the methods used to extract and analyze digital data must be scientifically sound and reliable, often necessitating expert testimony to explain technical processes to the jury.
  • Hearsay Evidence and Testimony
    Hearsay evidence, which is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, is generally inadmissible. However, there are exceptions to this rule that can apply in child pornography cases. For example, statements made by children or victims might be admissible under certain conditions, such as if they fall under the "excited utterance" or "present sense impression" exceptions. Witness testimony, particularly that of law enforcement officers and digital forensic experts, also plays a crucial role and must meet the credibility and reliability standards set forth by the court.
  • Relevance and Prejudice
    For evidence to be admissible, it must be relevant to the case, meaning it has a tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. However, even relevant evidence can be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury. In child pornography cases, the graphic nature of the material can be highly prejudicial. Courts must carefully weigh the necessity of presenting such evidence against the potential for undue prejudice.
Our Blog

Stay In The Know

  • Trump Labor Nominee’s Conflicting Stances on Sex Crimes
AGGRESSIVE DEFENSE IN & OUT OF THE COURTROOM

START YOUR FIGHT

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to receive text messages from Beckham Law Firm at the number provided, including those related to your inquiry, follow-ups, and review requests, via automated technology. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Msg & data rates may apply. Msg frequency may vary. Reply STOP to cancel or HELP for assistance. Acceptable Use Policy