Miami Antitrust Violation Attorneys
Antitrust Laws Can Be Especially Complex
In the United States, antitrust laws are in place to protect trade and commerce, but what impact do they have on free-market capitalism? Businesses must often toe the line to remain relevant and successful, and they may face federal investigations or charges alleging antitrust violations as a result.
Our Miami antitrust violation lawyers are prepared to represent clients facing alleged violations of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1-7), the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 12-27), and other federal antitrust laws. Cases of this nature may involve lengthy federal investigations and complex evidentiary issues that require the insight of a skilled legal team, and we have the resources and skills to provide capable federal defense counsel.
We can help at any stage of an antitrust matter, even before charges are filed, so do not wait to schedule a free initial consultation with our team. Call (786) 244-8010 or contact us online today.
VICTORY BEGINS WITH BECKHAM SOLIS
-
Felony Attempted Burglary – Case DismissedAt 10:50 PM, law enforcement was dispatched in emergency mode to respond to a burglary in progress. The officer made contact with victim and he stated that he observed through the peep hole a male with a black shirt wearing a mask and hitting his apartment door with a hammer. The Defendant was attempting to gain force entrance. Victim 1 stated that the Defendant looked like his neighbor who had several disputes in the past with others neighbors and provide the officer with the Defendant’s apartment number #107. The officer made contact with the Defendant and his grandmother. The grandmother stated that the Defendant keeps the hammer in his closet and provide it to the officer. The witness who lives nearby said she heard a loud noise and stepped outside to see what it was. The witness observed the Defendant hammering the door and described the Defendant. She also stated she recognized him as a male who lives in APT#107. The Defendant matched the description and was arrested, charged with Felony Attempted Burglary of an occupied dwelling.
-
Felony Exploitation – Case DismissedThe Defendant was employed as social workers and assigned as the caretaker of several elderly people including the 68 years old victim. The Defendant was in a position of trust and had access to the social services office where the victim’s money was kept in a locked box. The box was checked on 07/22/2019 and was missing $200. The Defendant denied taking the money and was taken into custody on a separate charge. The Defendant then admitted to going into the victim’s box and stealing the $200 and was arrested, charged with felony exploitation of an elderly and disabled person.
-
Felony Drug Possession – Case DismissedAt 3:47 AM, law enforcement officer observed the Defendant sitting on the bus stop past curfew. The officer conducted a subject check to find the reasons the Defendant was stationary at the location. The Defendant stated that he was playing a game that required him to be seated. The officer then conducted a pat down and a sharp pointy object was discovered in the Defendant’s left pocket. The Defendant identified the oil as liquid marijuana inside of the pen. The Defendant was then arrested as during curfew period no person shall make use of any streets or sidewalk for any purpose expect active duty, police, fire-rescue first responder, medical health care and utility repair person as well as those returning to their home from work of employment. Defendant charged with felony drug possession.
-
Aggravated Assault w/ Deadly Weapon, Domestic Violence, and Child Abuse – Case DismissedAt 4:28 PM, officer was dispatched in reference to a domestic disturbance between a father and son. Upon arrival, the officer made contact with the Defendant who stated he had a physical altercation with his father. The Defendant stated that he arrived to the residency where he lives with his mother and father; and then a verbal argument ensued with his father which led them to confronting each other in the backyard of the residence. The Defendant also states that his father struck him on the right side of his face causing a litigation to his right eyebrow. The officer observed a strong odor of alcohol from the Defendant. The victim stated the Defendant arrived to the residence in a bad mood and began to argue with his mother at which time the victim intervened. The victim also states that the Defendant repeatedly struck him while they were on the ground. The mother of the Defendant then confirmed this. The Defendant was arrested and charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, domestic violence strangulation, and child abuse.
-
Domestic Violence Strangulation – Case DismissedAt 4:38 PM law enforcement began to investigate, both the Defendant and Victim 1. The Defendant was taken into custody and taken into interview room for further questioning. The Defendant admitted that he and victim 1 were involved in a verbal dispute but denied that the incident ever became physical. The Defendant and the victims were inside the Defendants vehicle when the argument occurred. Victim 1 explained that the argument escalated when the Defendant slapped her on the left side of her face and moments later on twice on her left thigh. Upon arrival at their home, the Defendant grabbed victim 1 by her hair and shoved her on the bed and mounted her as she now laid next to victim 2. The Defendant then took a black semi-automatic handgun from his waist and stated aloud “Do you want to die today!” Victim 2 began to cry and Victim 1 fled the residence with their child. Victim 1 during the investigation disclosed the Defendant had battered her in the past and provided photographs of the three other events. The Defendant denied this accusations and advised that he was unaware she was injured on those dates. The Defendant was arrested and charged with domestic violence strangulation.
Defending Your Rights When Accused of All Types Of Antitrust Violations
Antitrust law is an extremely complicated legal area, requiring strict compliance with state and federal laws. Whether you are planning an acquisition or have been informed that you are under investigation for an alleged offense, you need to move quickly to involve an attorney.
Our Miami antitrust violation attorneys can handle cases involving:
- Price fixing
- Restraints
- Price discrimination
- Monopolization
- Bid rigging
- Unfair trade practices
- Illegal mergers and acquisitions
From the moment you retain Beckham Solis, Attorneys at Law, we can take over all communication with federal agents and prosecutors. We can handle every aspect of your case or the investigation against you to protect your interests. You can count on our discretion, professionalism, and commitment to your case.
What Is the Clayton Act?
The Clayton Act, enacted in 1914, was designed to enhance the provisions of the Sherman Act by addressing specific practices that could lead to anti-competitive outcomes. One of the key features of the Clayton Act is its focus on preventing mergers and acquisitions that may substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly. It prohibits certain types of mergers that could lead to a concentration of market power with the goal of safeguarding a competitive marketplace. Specifically, the act contains detailed provisions regarding price discrimination, exclusive dealing agreements, and tying arrangements, all of which can distort competition if left unchecked.
In the context of antitrust violation cases, the Clayton Act serves as a critical tool for regulators and legal bodies. The act allows for both private and government enforcement actions, giving individuals and businesses the right to sue for triple damages if they suffer losses due to violations. Additionally, the Clayton Act established the Federal Trade Commission's ability to investigate and challenge potentially harmful business practices before they can cause irreparable harm to competition.
Because of its proactive approach, the Clayton Act serves to respond to anti-competitive conduct as well as prevent such actions from occurring in the first place. Another notable aspect of the Clayton Act is its provisions concerning certain types of conduct that can lead to anti-competitive behavior, such as interlocking directorates, where the same individuals serve on the boards of competing companies.
Time is of the essence if you or your organization is under investigation for an antitrust violation. Contact our Miami antitrust violation lawyers online or at Beckham Solis, Attorneys at Law for a free review of your case.
hear how we made a difference
-
"They went above and beyond with closing everything in a timely manner."
The staff at Beckham Solis did an amazing job handling my case. They went above and beyond with closing everything in a timely manner. They were very reasonable with pricing and very flexible with payment. Barbara was very helpful answering any questions or concerns that I had. I highly recommend these law professionals to handle any legal matters you may need resolved.
- Joel D. -
"They made a difficult situation better."Few years back I ran into some legal trouble and was recommended to Beckham Solis by a friend. I had never had to deal with any of this so, it was quite terrifying, to be honest. I walked into his office a nervous wreck, walked out confident and taken care of. Great service. Answers all calls whenever you need help and advice; they made a difficult situation better. I greatly recommend this firm the best !- Carlens E.
-
"Great response rate, amazing customer service."Beckham Solis, Attorneys at Law, has always been available to answer all my questions. They offer a great response rate, amazing customer service, and a team that genuinely cares about its clients. Thank you, everyone, for everything!- Fabrizio Q.
-
"Professional, attentive, and efficient."Service has been top-notch since February. Beckham Solis, Attorneys at Law, are professional, attentive, efficient, experienced, and qualified. My case was quickly resolved, and I'm very thankful. Extremely happy with the outcome and highly recommend this firm.- Carolina G.
-
"Experience, expertise, and support."I worked with Beckham Solis, Attorneys at Law, for two years. Their experience, expertise, and support helped me make the best decision to save my life. I was facing serious time, but it was all adjudicated. They got me out of the worst time of my life. Th- J.D.
-
"Knowledgeable, skilled professionals!"I'm so happy I found these lawyers on the Internet. I was very nervous and scared when I walked into the office, thinking a bad outcome could change my life drastically. They were able to get my case dismissed! I highly recommend Beckham Solis, Attorneys a- Leonel D.
-
"Thanks to their experience and hands on attitude my case was dismissed."
I highly recommended Beckham & Solis, for a top notch professional & straight forward criminal defense representation. They are fast, on point & available at anytime. Thanks to their experience and hands on attitude my case was dismissed. It is a total life changer. Thanks so much to the whole team you are the Best!
- Luis C. -
"Top notch attorneys and staff that are fully committed."
Top notch attorneys and staff that are fully committed to walking you through every step of the legal process. I would recommend this legal powerhouse to anyone who is seriously looking to challenge their case and expecting a positive outcome. Thank you for everything Beckham and Solis!!
- Steve B.
STAY IN THE KNOW
-
The effects of heat and dehydration on your blood alcohol content -
Sleeping in a car while under the influence can get you a DUI
-
Miami’s breakup with spring break and its DUI crackdown
